Preview

The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication

Advanced search

The Splendour and Misery of the Anthropological Crisis: a Myth of Contemporary Russian Philosophy

https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2023-2-1-29-35

Abstract

The concept of the anthropological crisis is very popular in contemporary Russian humanities: the Russian Scientific Electronic Library (Elibrary.ru) includes more than 10,000 publications with the keyword “anthropological crisis”. On the contrary, Google gives links to Russian publications only when searching “anthropological crisis”. This keyword has no reference in the famous online book catalogue Worldcat. org. Nowadays, English-speaking scientific communities still explore the crisis in anthropology as a discipline. The difference between the anthropological crisis and the crisis in anthropology seems essential. The crisis of a scientific discipline is not a crisis of human nature. Modern Russian scholars, including the late Vyacheslav Stepin, find many features of the anthropological crisis in the successes of genetic engineering and modern medicine, as well as in the growing psychological pressures that people face. Russian-language scholars find traits of the anthropological crisis in many fields, including studies of memory, bioethics, pedagogics, literature, and economics. Others, such as Vyacheslav Stepin and Boris Pruzhinin, point to the loss of a sense of meaning in life as a sign of the anthropological crisis. The problems of self-identity are also marked by Russian authors as a mark of that crisis. Sergey Averintsev felt that human beings lack human nature. Pruzhinin supposes humans cannot predict the consequences of genetic engineering for their nature as a species. But all these trends have nothing in common with the anthropological crisis. Genetic engineering helps to improve human health and self-realization. Certainly, we cannot envision all the possible consequences, but this is true of any scientific discovery or breakthrough. Cyborgs are an inevitable step towards healthier and smarter humans. Existential problems are universal since all humans are endowed with self-consciousness. Self-identities have been in constant flux since the birth of complex societies, especially since the industrial revolution strengthened alienation. The growth and volume of information flows are not threats to humans, as there is no need to memorize all the data in the world, and there are multiple network and personal filters which block garbage. The anthropological crisis seems a myth in contemporary Russian-language humanities in general and philosophy in particular. 

About the Author

A. O. Zakharov
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Russian Federation

Anton O. Zakharov – Doctor of History, Lead Research Fellow (Southeast Asia, Australia and Pacific), Institute of Oriental Studies; Professor at the e Department of Philosophy and the Humanities

12 Rozhdestvenka str., Moscow, Russia, 107031;

29 Sretenka str., Moscow, Russia, 127051



References

1. Beck U. 2015. Weltrisikogesellschaft: auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Edition zweite Moderne).

2. Beck U. 2016. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

3. Boronoeva N. A. 2013. Antropologicheskiy krizis v kontekste globalizatsii [Anthropological crisis in the context of globalization]. Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 5. P. 202–207. (In Russian).

4. Eriksen T. H. 2001. Øyeblikkets tyranni. Oslo: Aschehoud. In Tiraniya momenta: Vremya v epokhu informatsii. 2003. (Russ. ed.). Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.

5. Kamalieva I. R. 2018. The Anthropological Crisis in Modern Medicine. Philosophy and Culture. 5(5). P. 65–70. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2018.5.26164

6. Kolyadko I. N. 2022. The Anthropological Crisis of the Technogenic Civilization: Parameters and Perspectives on How to Overcome it. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 76–80. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-76-80

7. Korol A. D. 2021. The Anthropological Crisis in the Social Realities of the 21st Century. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 64(5). P. 45–56. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-5-45-56

8. Krokhina N. P. 2020. The Anthropological Crisis in the Reception of Russian Literature of the Late Twentieth Century. Noosfernye issledovaniâ. 2. P. 78–83. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.46724/NOOS.2020.2.78-83

9. Lomako O. M. 2019. The Anthropological Crisis in the Risk Society: A Philosophical Analysis. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 23(1). P. 66–73. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-1-66-73

10. Pruzhinin B. I. 2022. The Anthropological Crisis as a Theme of Philosophy. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 86–92. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-86-92.

11. Rybakov S., Stepanov I. I. 2021. Postmodernism in Pedagogy as a Reflection of the Fundamental Anthropological Crisis. Duhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie. 4. P. 3–8. (In Russian).

12. Sabancheev R. Y. 2022. The Phenomenon of Memory in the Era of the Crisis of Technogenic Civilization. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 71–75. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-87442022-3-71-75

13. Sokolova S. N. 2021. The Anthropological Crisis: Human Security and Society During the Pandemic. Vestnik Polesskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ obŝestvennyh i gumanitarnyh nauk. 1. P. 74–80. (In Russian).

14. Stepin V. S. 2011. Tsivilizatsiya i kul’tura [Civilization and Culture]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP Publ. (In Russian).

15. Sugrobova Y. Y., Karpova I. D., Dorofei Y. O. 2020. The Parameters of the Anthropological Crisis and the Modern Global Generation. Man and Culture. 6. P. 22–34. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.25136/2409-8744.2020.6.34308

16. Terekhin E. L. 2022. Search for New Types of Scientific Rationality in an Anthropological Crisis: a Relativistic Approach. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 81–86. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-81-85

17. Zhelnin A. I. 2015. The Informational Dimension of the Anthropologic Crisis of Civilization (on the Informational Impact on the Person, Human Psychology and Biology). Informacionnoe obŝestvo. 6. P. 35–41. (In Russian).

18. Zvonok A. A. 2021. Modern Science and Education: Anthropological Crisis. Vestnik Luganskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. Ser. 1: Pegagogicheskie nauki. Ovrazovanie. 64(2). P. 5–9. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Zakharov A.O. The Splendour and Misery of the Anthropological Crisis: a Myth of Contemporary Russian Philosophy. The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2023;2(1):29-35. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2023-2-1-29-35

Views: 227


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-6330 (Online)