Preview

The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication

Advanced search

Digital Diplomacy in Russia–Europe Relations: Cross-Cultural Aspects

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-4-20-30-40

Abstract

The development of information and communication technologies and the formation of the global information society give rise to the study of new directions in the evolution of diplomatic practice in the digital environment, including in the context of intercultural communication. The modern information revolution is characterized by the widespread and ever-growing use of social networks, blogs, wiki resources and other media platforms (labelled under the common term of Web 2.0 technologies). At the same time, the widespread use of Web 2.0 technologies and the increasing amount of time people all over the world spend there has a broad and profound impact on political and intercultural communication and diplomatic practice. A new phenomenon of digital diplomacy is gaining prominence among the foreign policy tools of states and international organizations. Digital diplomacy can be defined as the use of social networks and Web 2.0 technologies in public diplomacy and international interaction by states and international organizations to achieve foreign policy goals and reach foreign audiences. According to the traditional view of digital diplomacy, which has developed in the academic literature, and is reflected in the works of authors such as Manuel Castells and Joseph. Nye, it helps to strengthen network ties at the level of civil societies in different countries and thus reduces international conflicts. However, cultural differences and digital polarization can impede the potential of digital diplomacy. Today, almost all states and international organizations in the global arena are involved in the practice of digital diplomacy, and Russia is no exception. Russia actively participates in digital diplomacy by using social media and Web 2.0 tools as soft power instruments to introduce and explain foreign policy initiatives and reach foreign and domestic audiences, as stated in the 2016 Doctrine of Information Security of Russian Federation. For Russia’s foreign policy, relations with the EU countries and institutions are of particular importance, including in the digital sphere. However, even though both Russia and the EU countries make extensive use of digital diplomacy tools, the practice of horizontal network interaction mediated by digital technologies does not contribute to strengthening trust between countries and reducing conflicts. The authors consider incidents and allegations in the sphere of digital interaction and, based on the theory of digital polarization, conclude that the use of digital tools in horizontal interactions within digital diplomacy exacerbates intercultural differences between countries and increases conflict instead of improving mutual understanding.

About the Authors

E. V. Zinovieva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Elena S. Zinovieva  – Dr. Sci. (Political Science), Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of World Politics, Deputy Director of the Center for International Information Security, Science and Technology Policy

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



V. I. Bulva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Valeria I. Bulva  – Expert, Assistant Director, Center for International Information Security, Science and Technology Policy

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Alborova M. B. 2019. Diplomatiia gorodov, kak vazhnyi faktor razvitiia sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v usloviiakh tsifrovoi tsivilizatsii [City Diplomacy as an Important Factor of the Development of Modern International Relations in a Digital Civilization]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences]. 8(1). P. 136–139. https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11473. (In Russian)

2. Bjola C., Zaiotti R. (eds.) 2020. Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations. Abingdon; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032724.

3. Boyd A., et al. 2019. Data Diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. Available at: http://sciencediplomacy.org/article/2019/data-diplomacy.

4. Castells M. 2014. The Impact of the Internet on Society: A Global Perspective. Change: 19 Key Essays on How the Internet is Changing our Lives. Madrid: Turner. P. 127–148.

5. Feezell J. T. 2018. Agenda Setting through Social Media: The Importance of Incidental News Exposure and Social Filtering in the Digital Era. Political Research Quarterly. 71(2). P. 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895.

6. Foglesong D. S. 2020. When the Russians Really Were Coming: Citizen Diplomacy and the end of Cold War Enmity in America. Cold War History. 20(4). P. 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2020.17353 68.

7. Hong S., Kim S. H. 2016. Political Polarization on Twitter: Implications for the Use of Social Media in Digital Governments. Government Information Quarterly. 33(4). P. 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007.

8. Kharkevich M. V. 2014. «Miagkaia sila»: politicheskoe ispol'zovanie nauchnoi kontseptsii [Soft Power: The Political Use of a Scientific Concept]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [MGIMO Review of International Relations]. No. 2. P. 22–29. (In Russian)

9. Lebedeva M. M. (ed.) 2017. Publichnaia diplomatiia: Teoriia i praktika [Public Diplomacy: Theory and Practice]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russian)

10. Lebedeva M. M. 2018. Potentsial rossiiskoi publichnoi diplomatii [The Potential of Russian Public Diplomacy]. Transformatsiia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v XXI veke: vyzovy i perspektivy. Materialy konferentsii [Transformation of International Relations in the 21st Century: Challenges and Prospects. Conference Proceedings]. Moscow. P. 102–104. (In Russian)

11. Lebedeva M. M., Nikitina Y. A. (eds.) 2020. Mezhdunarodnaia bezopasnost': global'nye i regional'nye aktory [International Security: Global and Regional Actors]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russian)

12. Lebedeva O. V. 2021. Rol' sotsial'nykh setei v diplomaticheskoi praktike Rossii [The Role of Social Networks in Russian Diplomatic Practice]. Mezhdunarodnaia zhizn' [International Affairs]. No. 3. P. 20–27. (In Russian)

13. Manor I. 2019. The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04405-3

14. Nye J. S. 2010. Cyber Power. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

15. Podberezkin A. I. 2016. Voennaia sila i politika novoi publichnoi diplomatii [Military Force and the Policy of the New Public Diplomacy]. Obozrevatel' [Observer]. No. 12. P. 15–25 (In Russian)

16. Tsvetkova N. A., Kuznetsov N. M. 2020. Fenomen diplomatii bol'shikh dannykh v mirovoi politike [Phenomenon of Big Data Diplomacy in World Politics]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriia «Politologiia. Istoriia. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia» [RSUH Bulletin. Series “Political Sciences. History. International Relations”]. No. 4. P. 27–44. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2020-4-27-44. (In Russian)

17. Tsygankov P. A. 2015. «Gibridnye voiny»: poniatie, interpretatsii i real'nost' [Hybrid Wars: Concept, Interpretations and Reality]. «Gibridnye voiny» v khaotiziruiushchemsia mire XXI veka [Hybrid Wars in the Chaotized World of the 21st Century. Moscow: Moscow University Press]. P. 7–32. (In Russian)

18. Zinovieva E.S. 2013. Tsifrovaia diplomatiia SShA: vozmozhnosti i ugrozy dlia mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti [U.S. Digital Diplomacy: Opportunities and Threats to International Security]. Indeks bezopasnosti [Security Index]. 19(1). P. 213–228. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Zinovieva E.V., Bulva V.I. Digital Diplomacy in Russia–Europe Relations: Cross-Cultural Aspects. The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2022;1(1-2):84-93. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-4-20-30-40

Views: 889


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-6330 (Online)