Mission Possible: Blogging Russian Orthodox Priests
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-44-59
Abstract
The present paper dwells on the modern phenomenon of the clergy going online and exploring new audiences. The empirical study conducted by the author concerned the activities of popular Russian-speaking Orthodox bloggers whose heightening media presence is aimed at digital missionary work and catechism. The research was organized in accordance with the theoretical framework of the concept of communicative figurations that was coined by Andreas Hepp. This constructivist approach implies that mediatization blurs the borders between previously disentangled actors and encourages the growth of their interactions and, thus, a tighter social reality. To embody a communi-cative figurations-oriented study, the author lays down methodological foundations that are able to express the nature of personal practices and the reflections on them. For this purpose, the methods used consisted of case studies, expert and field interviews, and online text analysis. The findings can be set out in the following manner. Online media activity and social networking allow greater transparency and a wider audience. Despite stereotype and politicized doxa, the online demand for a specific niche of purely catechetic Orthodox priest blogging has existed for a decade and a half. Over the years, media practices of missionary work, catechism, and preaching have been formed, mainly on such social networks as VK.com, LiveJournal and Instagram, and on YouTube channels. This dynamic has been growing: priest blogs have acquired the audiences of tens of thousands of subscribers. This is because priests use contemporary language when addressing the public for the purpose of missionary work and catechism. They attract an audience of the Russian-speaking network of actors that is diverse in age, gender, and country of residence. Seeing and aiming beyond the conservative confines of an offline parish and church, blogging priests have the opportunity to create their own audience – to reach out to a particular generation, choose the style and content of a sermon or testimony of faith. In turn, the audiences choose priest bloggers according to their interests and the preferred methods of religious participation. Orthodox blogger priests strive to consolidate their efforts, to promote various forms of testimony of faith in the digital space. The central direct consequence of the mediatization of catechism and missionary practices is the promotion of a new image of the priest and a new version of priest–layman interaction, both contributing to a new church construct.
About the Author
E. A. OstrovskayaRussian Federation
Elena A. Ostrovskaya — Doctor of Sociology, Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Sociology
7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Bogdanova O. 2020. Mediatizatsiia pastyrstva v Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi: predposylki formiro-vaniia saitov s voprosami sviashchenniku [Mediatization of Pastoral Care in the Russian Orthodox Church: Preconditions of the Emergence of Websites with Questions to the Priest in the Context of the Mediatization of Religion]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. 38(2). P. 207–234. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-2-207-234. (In Russian)
2. Suslov M. (ed.) 2016. Digital Orthodoxy in the Post-Soviet World: The Russian Orthodox Church and Web 2.0. Ibidem-Verlag. 321 p.
3. Grishaeva E., Shumkova V. 2018. Traditsionalistskie pravoslavnye media: struktura diskursa i osobennosti funktsionirovaniia [Traditionalist Orthodox Christian Media: Discourse Structure and Peculiarities of the Functioning]. The Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic & Social Changes. 2. P. 291–308. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.2.17. (In Russian)
4. Grishaeva E.I., Busygin A.G. 2020. Internet v pravoslavnom prikhode: osobennosti vzaimodeistviia pravoslavnykh pol'zovatelei s internet-tekhnologiiami [The Internet in the Orthodox Parish: Peculiarities of Interaction between Orthodox Users and Internet Technologies]. Nauchnyi rezul'tat Sotsiologiia i upravlenie [Research Result. Sociology and Management]. 6(1). P. 3–15. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-1-0-1. (In Russian)
5. Hasebrink U., Hepp, A. 2016. How to Research Cross-Media Practices? Investigating Media Repertoires and Media Ensembles. Communicative Figurations. Working Paper. 15. 19 p.
6. Heckathorn D.D. 2007. Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Analyzing Continuous Variables and Controlling for Differential Recruitment. Sociological Methodology. 37(1). P. 151–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00188.x.
7. Hepp A. 2020. Deep Mediatization. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. 248 p.
8. Hepp A. 2020. Issledovanie kommunikativnykh figuratsii mediatizirovannykh mirov v usloviiakh “total'noi mediatsii” [The Communicative Figurations of Mediatized Worlds: Mediatization Research in Times of the ‘Mediation of Everything’]. State Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 38(2). P. 98–123. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-2-98-123. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Ostrovskaya E.A. Mission Possible: Blogging Russian Orthodox Priests. The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2022;1(4):4-20. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-44-59