Preview

The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication

Advanced search

Cultural and Educational Policy of Sweden as an Element of Nation Branding

https://doi.org/10.24833/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-4-4-22

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between soft power, nation branding, and educational and cultural cooperation within the framework of the Swedish Institute’s policy of international cooperation to promote the country’s image abroad and strengthen its reputational capital. The relevance of this topic is due to the significance of the stated agenda, which, as our research has shown, has influenced both the development of cultural cooperation and academic exchanges, and the specific features of the construction of Sweden’s foreign policy image. Through an analysis of Swedish Institute materials (primarily data from reports published in 2022–2034), the authors examine the process of how the organization’s activities are prioritized based on the distribution of financial support and the focus of its cultural and educational projects. To this end, we analyse the role and parameters of building a national brand; consider changes in the content of educational and cultural events and programmes conducted by Sweden in Eastern Europe and the Baltics; trace the dynamics of the processes of cultural exchange between Sweden and the countries of these regions; note the influence of the current political situation on the volume and measures of financial assistance to them; and describe the perception of Sweden in Russia, Eastern Europe and the Baltics. The study is based on the methods of comparative analysis, discourse analysis, and case study techniques. We conclude that in implementing a diverse range of educational and cultural programmes, the Swedish Institute adheres to the principle of regionalism, which allows such projects to be implemented with due account of the interests and needs of both Sweden and partner countries. We also show that when determining the parameters of national branding, the Swedish Institute relies on the approach of Simon Anholt, refining it in a number of areas. According to the findings of the study, the adaptation of relevant programmes for the development of cooperation with partner countries is aimed at integrating specific Swedish values into the cultural matrix of the host cultures. At the same time, the programmes implemented in this area are greatly influenced by the current political situation, thus excluding such an important international partner as Russia. The study confirms the initial thesis about the relatively slow accumulation of Sweden’s reputational capital, including in the process of the Swedish Institute’s work with“promising”(in the current environment) countries, as well as with the countries of Eastern Europe and the Baltics. We further conclude that the Swedish Institute is not only a key actor in the country’s cultural and educational policy, as well as a powerful channel of soft power, but also an instrument for Sweden to position itself as a moral superpower, which can be seen in many areas of its policies that go beyond public diplomacy.

English translation from the Russian text: Dianina S. Y., Zolotukhina Y. I., 7 Ragozin G. S. 2024. Cultural and Representative Policy of Sweden as an Element of Nation Branding. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. 8(1). P. 91–111. (In Russian). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-29-91-111

About the Authors

S. Y. Dianina
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Svetlana Y. Dianina – Ph.D. (Philosophy), Senior Lecturer, Department of North European and Baltic Languages 

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454

 



Yu. I. Zolotukhina
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Yulia I. Zolotukhina – Lecturer, Department of North European and Baltic Languages, MGIMO University, PhD student 

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



G. S. Ragozin
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation

German S. Ragozin – Ph.D. (History), Associate Professo

17, Severnaya Dvina street, Arkhangelsk, 163002



References

1. Åkerlund A. 2018. The Slow Reunification of Development Assistance and Public Diplomacy: Exchange and Collaboration Activities Through the Swedish Institute 1973–2012. In Pamment J., Wilkins K. (Eds.). Communicating National Image through Development and Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan. P. 143–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76759-8_7

2. Åkerlund A. 2020. Regeringsstyrning av svensk offentlig diplomati: om Svenska institutets myndighetsin-struktioner och regleringsbrev 1998–2018. Elanders.

3. Andreeva T. L., Kern K. E. 2017. Linguistic aspect as a factor of the foreign policy of the People’s Republic of China in the 21st century. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 417. P. 25–29. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/417/4

4. Anholt S. 1998. Nation-brands of the twenty-first century. Journal of Brand Management. 5(6). P. 395–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1998.30.

5. Anholt S. 2007. Competitive Identity: A new model for the brand management of nations, cities and regions. Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review. 4. P. 3–13.

6. Anholt S. 2011. Beyond the Nation Brand: The Role of Image and Identity in International Relations. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy. 2(1). P. 6–12.

7. Antonova N. L., Sushchenko A. D., Popova N. G. 2020. Soft Power of Higher Education as a Global Leadership Factor. The Education and Science Journal. 22(1). P. 31–58. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-1-31-58

8. Belukhin N. E., Vorotnikov V. V., Dianina S. Y. 2022. The Total Defense Concept as the Embodiment of Sweden’s Strategic Culture. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 15(6). P. 135–165. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-135-165

9. Biletska O. 2021. Culture as a Nation Branding Tool within the International Interaction System. Culture and Arts in the Modern World. 22. P. 22–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/24101915.22.2021.235887

10. Boldyreva S., Boldyrev R., Beloshitskaya N. 2020. Federal University’s Role in the Implementation of the Russian Federation “Soft Power” Conception in Central Asia (The Case of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Named After M.V. Lomonosov). Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2. P. 223–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu4.2020.2.16

11. Butakova A. A., Portnyagina M. D. 2020. The phenomenon of “northern identity” and its impact on modern international relations. Saint Petersburg and Northern European countries. 22. P. 318–327. (In Russian).

12. Dahl A.-S. 2006. Sweden: Once a Moral Superpower, Always a Moral Superpower? International Journal. 61(4). P. 895–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40204222

13. Dinnie K. 2022. Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003100249

14. Fan Y. 2010. Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 6(2). P. 97–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.16

15. Glover N. 2012. National Relations: Public Diplomacy, National Identity and the Swedish Institute 1945–1970. Nordic Academic Press.

16. Govorova N. V., Zhuravel V. P., Samylovskaya E. A. 2018. Rossiyskaya Arktika: problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [Russian Arctic: international cooperation issues]. Contemporary Europe. 1. P. 156–159.

17. Ham P. van 2001. The Rise of the Brand State: The Postmodern Politics of Image and Reputation. Foreign Aff irs. 80(5). P. 2–6. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/20050245

18. Koroleva A. A. 2024. Naslediye i identichnost’ territorii: brikolazh ispanskikh kul’turnykh landshaftov [Heritage and territorial identity: A bricolage of Spanish cultural landscapes]. MGIMO University (In Russian).

19. Kotler P. et al. 1999. Marketing Places Europe: How to Attract Investments, Industries, Residents and Visitors to Cities, Communities, Regions, and Nations in Europe. Financial Times Prentice Hall.

20. Kotler P., Gertner D. 2002. Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management. 9(4). P. 249–261. https://doi. org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076

21. Kovaleva D. M. 2014. Myagkaya sila obrazovaniya kak sredstvo ustanovleniya kulturnykh svyazey i dostizheniya politicheskikh tseley [Soft Power of Education as a Means of Establishing Cultural Ties and Achieving Political Goals]. In Rossiya i Vostok: kulturnye svyazi v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Russia and the East: cultural connections in the past and present]. ANO VPO Gumanitarnyy Universitet Publishing. P. 33–36. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-2991-111

22. Kuznetsov S. V., Mezhevich N. M., Bolotov D. A. 2016. Prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo na Severozapade Rossii: teoriya, rossijskaya praktika v novyh geopoliticheskih usloviyah [Cross-border cooperation in the north-west of Russia: Theory, Russian practical implementation in new geopolitical conditions]. In Perspektivy socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya prigranichnykh regionov [Border regions socio-economic development perspectives]. Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences. P. 54–57.

23. Larsen H. 2021. The Arctic Exception: The Role of the EU in the Kingdom of Denmark’s Arctic Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review. 26(2). P. 289–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ EERR2021020

24. Leonova O. G. 2013. Soft power is a resource of the state’s foreign policy. Observer. 4. P. 27–40. (In Russian).

25. Lundén T. 2022. Turning towards the inland sea? Swedish ‘soft diplomacy’ towards the Baltic Soviet republics before independence. Scandinavian Journal of History. 47(3). P. 347–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2021.1896576

26. Marklund C. 2009. The Social Laboratory, the Middle Way and the Swedish Model: three frames for the image of Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of History. 34(3). P. 264–285. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/03468750903134715

27. Marklund C. 2017. The Nordic Model on the Global Market of Ideas: The Welfare State as Scandinavia’s Best Brand. Geopolitics. 22(3). P. 623–639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.20 16.1251906

28. Marklund C. 2021. The Utopian Trap. Between Contested Swedish Models and Benign Nordic Branding. In Byrkjeflot H., Mjøset L., Mordhorst M., Petersen K. (Eds.) The Making and Circulation of Nordic Models, Ideas and Images. Routledge P. 62–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156925

29. Nye J. S. 1990. Soft Power. Foreign Policy. 80. P. 153–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580 Olins W. 2005. Making a National Brand. In Jan Melissen (Ed.) The New Public Diplomacy.

30. Palgrave Macmillan. P. 169–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_9

31. Parshin P. B. 2020. Myagkaya sila v labirinte diskussiy [Soft power in a maze of debate]. MGIMO University. (In Russian).

32. Podoplekin A. O. et al. 2014. International Arctic Science Committee: Arctic Research Priorities. The Arctic Herald. 4. P. 18–28.

33. Ragozin G. S. 2023. The Swedish Institute’s scholarship policy as a soft power instrument. Baltic Region. 15(3). P. 66–82. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-4

34. Rugh W. 2017. American soft power and public diplomacy in the Arab world. Palgrave Communications. 3(1). P. 16104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.104

35. Ryzhkova I. V., Sergeev A. M. 2019. Internationalization of the Flagship University: Arctic Vector. Higher Education in Russia. 28(3). P. 127–136. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/08693617-2019-28-3-127-136

36. Silanteva M. 2019. Identity as a Communicative Project: “New Mythologies” in Modern Culture Space. Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies. 8(1). P. 19–25. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5c5a88d8040dd6.09767248

37. Smirnov A. I., Kokhtyulina I. N. 2012. Globalnaya bezopasnost i «myagkaya sila 2.0»: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [Global Security and Soft Power 2.0: Challenges and opportunities for Russia]. VNII Geosistem. (In Russian).

38. Torkunov A. V. 2012. Education as a Soft Power Tool in Russian Foreign Policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 4. P. 85–93. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-81602012-4-25-85-93

39. Tsygankov A. 2013. Vsesilno, ibo verno? [Is it almighty since it is right?]. Russia in Global Affairs. 11(6). P. 26–36. (In Russian).

40. Zhuravel V. 2021. Тhe Russian Federation’s Chairmanship at the Arctic Council. Contemporary Europe. 105(5). P. 90–99. (In Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520219099

41. Zhuravlev P. S. et al. 2015. Arktika v sisteme mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva i sopernichestva [Arctic in international cooperation and rivalry systems]. Solti. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Dianina S.Y., Zolotukhina Yu.I., Ragozin G.S. Cultural and Educational Policy of Sweden as an Element of Nation Branding. The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2024;3(4):4-22. https://doi.org/10.24833/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-4-4-22

Views: 45


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-6330 (Online)