The Impact of the Parameter Individualism versus Collectivism on the Formation of Behavioural Characteristics in People of Various National Cultures
https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-3-22-40
Abstract
Different theories of cross-cultural communication developed by researchers in the field of humanities including cultural anthropology, social psychology, cognitive science, etc., offer a variety of ways to classify national cultures. At the same time, many agree that there is a need to find clear and measurable fundamental parameters that underlie any national culture. This article substantiates the use of the parameter of “individualism versus collectivism,” which has already been tested in the framework of anthropology and philosophy of culture with regard to both Western and non-Western cultures, as an effective method of cultural comparison. In this paper, we aim to give an overview of various theories of cross-cultural interaction and their elements, examine where they overlap or diverge, look into the correlation between individualist/ collectivist value orientations and behaviour, and study how this parameter manifests itself in a number of cases. The study is based on philosophical, anthropological, and cultural psychological theories, including the theory of guilt and shame cultures by Ruth Benedict, the theory of self-presentation by Roy Baumeister and Debra Hutton, the theory of self-construal by Hazel Markus and Shinobu Kitayama, and the theory of cultural logics by Angela Leung and Dov Cohen. As empirical confirmation of the above theoretical approaches, this article provides real-life examples collected by the author. The relevant literature was subject to categorical analysis. Empirical data was collected and analysed using methods such as participant observation and discourse analysis. The comparative approach and hermeneutics techniques served as a general methodological prism. The study shows that, at least since the 1960s, specialists in the field of cultural studies have increasingly discovered limitations and inconsistencies in theories that previously claimed to be universal: many of the models which originated in the West do not adequately represent non-Western cultures. The study proves the workability of the parameter of individualism versus collectivism for the interpretation of behavioural inconsistencies between people of different cultures. This parameter is compatible with a wide range of frameworks and shows a clear correlation between behavioural characteristics in different cultures and allows us to interpret phenomena that were previously uninterpretable.
English translation from the Russian text: Khalil M. A. 2024. The Impact of the Parameter Individualism Versus Collectivism on the Formation of Behavioural Characteristics in People of Various National Cultures. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. 8(1). P. 71–90. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-29-71-90
About the Author
Mona Abdel Malik Khalil
Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs
Egypt
Egypt
Mona Abdel Malik Khalil – Ph.D. (Philosophy), Member of the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs, Executive Director of The Russian–Egyptian Business Council at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-29-71-90
References
1. Baumeister R. F., Hutton D. G. 1987. Self-Presentation Theory: Self-Construction and Audience Pleasing. In Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Theories of Group Behavior Springer. P. 71–87). DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_4
2. Benedict R. 1989. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. HoughtonMifflin Trade and Reference.
3. Conrad R. 2019. Culture Hacks: Deciphering Differences in American, Chinese, and Japanese Thinking. Lioncrest Publishing.
4. D’Lima T., Solotaroff J. L., Pande R. P. 2020. For the Sake of Family and Tradition: Honour Killings in India and Pakistan. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change. 5(1). P. 22–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/24556327198808
5. Dianina S. Y. 2015. Honor Killings in the Context of Multiculturalism: Can Culture Kill? Issues of Cultural Studies. 1. P. 68–73. (In Russian)
6. Franck T. M. 1997. Is Personal Freedom a Western Value? American Journal of International Law. 91(4). P. 593–627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2998096
7. Geertz C. 1983. Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. Basic Books.
8. Gunkel M., Schlägel C., Engle R. L. 2014. Culture’s Influence on Emotional Intelligence: An Empirical Study of Nine Countries. Journal of International Management. 20(2). P. 256–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.10.002
9. Hills M. D. 2002. Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Values Orientation Theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 4(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1040
10. Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.
11. Huang S. 2022. Differences in the Principle of Politeness in Chinese and Russian Linguistic Cultures. Litera. (5). P. 176–183. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2022.5.37904
12. Kim Y.-H., Cohen D. 2010. Information, Perspective, and Judgments About the Self in Face and Dignity Cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36(4). P. 537–550. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167210362398
13. Khalil M. A. 2018. Perspectives of Religious Reform of Islam in the Light of Axiological Features of the Arab Culture. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series Philosophy. (1). P. 122–129. (In Russian)
14. Leung A. K.-Y., Cohen D. 2011. Withinand between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100(3). P. 507–526. DOI: doi:10.1037/a0022151
15. Lévy-Bruhl L. 1935. Primitives and the Supernatural. E. P. Dutton.
16. Malyavin V. 2007. Kitay upravlyayemyy. Staryy dobryy menedzhment [China controlled. Good old management]. Evropa. (In Russian)
17. Markus H. R., Kitayama S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 98(2). P. 224–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.98.2.224
18. Miceli M., Castelfranchi C. 2018. Reconsidering the differences between shame and guilt. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 14(3). P. 710–733. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1564
19. Minkov M. 2011. Cultural Differences in a Globalizing World. Emerald Group Publishing.
20. Minkov M., Sokolov B., Lomakin I. 2023. Evolution of the Hofstede Model of Cultural Dimensions: Parallels Between Objective and Subjective Culture. Russian Sociological Review. 22(3). P. 287–317. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-3-287-317
21. Murdock G. P. 1949. Social structure. The Free Press.
22. Murdock G. P., White D. R. 1969. Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Ethnology. 8(4). P. 329–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/3772907
23. Silantyeva M. V. et al. 2020. Filosofiya kul’tury v sisteme izucheniya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: v 2 kn. Kn. 1: Paradoksy issledovatel’skoy prizmy [Philosophy of culture in the system of studying international relations: in 2 books. Book 1: Paradoxes of the research prism]. MGIMO University Publishing. (In Russian).
24. Smith P. B. et al. 2021. Is an Emphasis on Dignity, Honor and Face more an Attribute of Individuals or of Cultural Groups?’ Cross-Cultural Research. 55(2–3). P. 95–126. https://doi. org/10.1177/1069397120979571
25. Spengler O. 1918. Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. Band 1. Gestalt und Wirklichkeit. Braumüller. (Russ. ed.: (1998) Zakat Evropy. Feniks.).
26. Teehankee J. C. 2005. Liberalism. A Primer. The National Institute for Policy Studies.
27. Triandis H. C. 1994. Culture and Social Behavior. McGraw-Hill.
28. Tsarkov I. I. 2015. Christian Anthropology. Vestnik Volžskogo universiteta imeni V.N. Tatiŝeva. (2). P. 256–264. (In Russian).
29. Vagapova N. A., Andriyanova A. A., Kuzmischova E. A. 2009. Communicative Qualities of the Person as the Factor without the Conflict of Interaction. Kazan State Power Engineering University Bulletin. (3). P. 47–51. (In Russian).
30. Wierzbicka A. 1991. Japanese Key Words and Core Cultural Values. Language in Society. 20(3). P. 333–385.
31. Yutang L. 2010. My Country and My People. Oxford City Press.
Review
For citations:
Khalil M.A. The Impact of the Parameter Individualism versus Collectivism on the Formation of Behavioural Characteristics in People of Various National Cultures. The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2024;3(3):22-40. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-3-22-40
Views:
33
Email this article 