Cancel Culture in Constructing the National identity of the Countries in the Caspian Macro-Region (Based on the Example of Textbooks in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan)
https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-1-26-45
Аннотация
The process of the formation of independent states on the territories of postSoviet republics raised the problem of the construction of their national identities. This process was propelled by the rejection of Soviet identity and the cultural legacy of the Soviet era. This rejection necessitated a reinterpretation of the historical past of the nations and a revision of the pantheon of national heroes. And the mechanism of cancel culture was used to achieve this. In general, the goal of cancel culture is to reject the values of a given culture and construct a new worldview. In this paper, we are interested in the Caspian macro-region, a geopolitically and economically attractive area not only for the five international actors that have access to the water area here (Russia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Iran, and Azerbaijan), but also for more distant states (China, Turkey, the United States, and leading European countries), all of which fight for influence in the Caspian basin. The Caspian region is a zone of heightened tension, where conflicts erupt from time to time (involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Iran, etc.). Thus, the study of the process of national identity construction in each country individually, as well as in the region as a whole, is not only a matter of scientific interest, but it is also a strategic task to ensure the security of the Caspian region, of which Russia is a part. The main purpose of this article is to analyse the mechanisms of constructing a new national identity in the Caspian countries through cancel culture, reconsidering their experience and historical development. This process can be seen most clearly in the example of changes in the education systems of the countries of the Caspian region. To conduct a comparative analysis, we took history and local history textbooks from secondary schools and institutions of higher education in the republics of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. The research was limited to the study of textbooks published in the Russian language. The selection was made by random sampling. This paper marks the first in a series of research projects on the construction of national identity in the post-Soviet space through the mechanism of cancel culture, presenting the results of the study of two countries in the Caspian Sea region – Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.
Ключевые слова
cancel culture,
identity,
transformation,
academic disciplines,
cultural security,
Caspian region,
Kazakhstan,
Turkmenistan
Об авторах
E. Khlyshcheva
V. N. Tatishchev Astrakhan State University
Россия
Россия
V. Tikhonova
V. N. Tatishchev Astrakhan State University
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Alekseeva T. S., Troitskaya Y. G. 2022. The Role of 21st Century Education in the Formation of the Foundations of National Identity. Naučnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 1. P. 51–57. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17805/trudy.2022.1.8
2. Arslanov R. A., Moseуkina М. N. 2022. National History in Textbooks of the Modern States of Central Asia: Goals and Methods of Presentation. Modern History of Russia. 12(1). P. 210–226. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2022.113
3. Bejsenbaeva A. S. 2017. O vnedrenii nacional'nogo proekta “Triedinstvo jazykov” [On the implementation of the national project “Trinity of Languages”]. Vestnik of M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University. 1. P. 39–43. (In Russian)
4. Borishpolets K. P. 2014. Russian Language in the Central Asia Region. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2. P. 63–70. (In Russian)
5. Burke K. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. University of California Press.
6. Chugrov S. V. 2022. Cancel Culture in World Politics: Historical and Philosophical Roots. Polis. Political Studies. 5. P. 88–98. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.07
7. Gaponenko L. B. 2020. The Construction of National Identity in the Context of the politics of memory. Diskurs-Pi. 17(3). P. 40–53. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1817-9568-2020-10303
8. Hampton K. N. 2010. Internet Use and the Concentration of Disadvantage: Glocalization and the Urban Underclass. American Behavioral Scientist. 53(8). P. 1111–1132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356244
9. Khlyshcheva E. 2022. Identity Formation in the Educational Process in Russia and Kazakhstan: Comparative Analysis. Polylogos. 6(4). (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18254/S258770110023490-1
10. Khlyshcheva E. V. 2021. The Caspian Region as a Space of Cultural Security. Caspium Securitatis: Journal of Caspian Safety & Security. 1(2). P. 81–93. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21672/2713-024X-2021-2-1-081-093
11. Lisitsa K. E., Turkulets V. A. 2022. Cancellation Culture as a Form of Stigmatization. Gumanitarnye, socialʹno-èkonomičeskie i obŝestvennye nauki. 6. P. 107–110. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23672/l9940-2233-9740-s
12. Lukianoff G., Haidt J. 2018. The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. Penguin Publishing Group.
13. Malakhov V. 2001. Simvolicheskoye proizvodstvo etnichnosti i konflikt [Symbolic production of ethnicity and conflict]. In Yazyk i etnicheskiy konflikt [Language and Ethnic Conflict]. Gendalf Publishers. P. 115–138. (In Russian)
14. Nakamura L. 2015. The Unwanted Labour of Social Media: Women of Colour Call Out Culture as Venture Community Management. New Formations. 86. P. 106–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.86.06.2015
15. Nikitin A. V. et al. 2022. Cancel Culture: Reasons for Development Challenges in Russia. Vlast’. 30(3). P. 65–69. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i3.9046
16. Norris P. 2023. Cancel Culture: Myth or Reality? Political Studies. 71(1). P. 145–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023
17. Nurgalieva Z. K. 2009. Search for a New Ethnic Identity in the Republic of Kazakhstan as a Nationalizing State. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriâ 12, Psihologiâ, sociologiâ, pedagogika. 3–1. P. 77–84. (In Russian)
18. Plotnikov D. S. 2016. Constructing the Past of Central Asia in the Context of Building Relations with Russia at the Present Stage. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiâ. 2. P. 156–167. (In Russian)
19. Ryzhichkin N. N. 2020. Post-Soviet Kazakhstan. The Paths of Building National Identity. Svobodnaâ mysl’. 3. P. 175–186. (In Russian)
20. Savelyeva I. M., Poletaev A. V. 2006. Znaniye o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya: v 2 t. T. 2: Obrazy proshlogo [Knowledge of the Past: Theory and History. In 2 vol. Vol. 2: Images of the Past]. Nauka. (In Russian)
21. Vodenko K. V. 2021. Management of Historical Memory as a Way of Forming the National Identity of a Multi-Ethnic Society. Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research. 12. P. 81–90. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52270/26585561_2021_12_14_81
22. Yu H. 2020. The Current Situation of the Russian Language in the States of Central Asia. Postsovetskie issledovaniâ. 3(3). P. 250–270. (In Russian)
23. Zvyagelskaya I. D. 2009. Stanovlenie gosudarstv Central`noj Azii: politicheskie processy [Formation of the States of Central Asia: Political Processes]. Aspekt Press. (In Russian)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, . The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2024;3(1):26-45. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-1-26-45
For citation:
Khlyshcheva E.V., Tikhonova V.L. Cancel Culture in Constructing the National identity of the Countries in the Caspian Macro-Region (Based on the Example of Textbooks in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan). The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2024;3(1):26-45. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-1-26-45
Просмотров:
23
Послать статью по эл. почте 