Preview

The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication

Advanced search

Elements of Anti-World in the Game Universe of The Witcher

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-2-18-52-62

Abstract

The significance of the study of philosophic aspects of building a new game universe in an RPG (role-playing game) stems from the popularity of this type of virtual reality entertainment. The paper gives an analysis of the anti-world, a key concept of role-playing gaming, based on The Witcher video game series. The game is founded on an original series of works under the same title created by Polish fantasy writer Andrzej Sapkowski. The case under consideration serves as a good example for looking into the patterns of forming the space of the game universe that can be equally regarded as a moment when a cultural landscape of virtual en-tertainment is formed. In this case, RPG can be considered as a socio-cultural practice of the global information society and/or one of the variants of the performance society. The methodological basis of the study is comparative analysis, which implies the identification of borrowings in the process of developing a culture of virtual entertainment and requires learning about basic cultural codes and archetypal designs that are specific to RPG. As a result of the research, the specificity of the new imagery form inherent in the game universe of The Witcher was revealed. The cultural landscape created in the game includes elements of the medieval laughter culture integrated into the unique system of dynamic images and meanings, constantly evolving and functioning in a way analogous with the established cultural and symbolic reality. The effect of the double symbolic analogy is determined by the creative nature of the game, in which players, in addition to participating in the gaming process, also contribute to the creation of the game. The introduction of game images into the language and thinking of the players causes the emergence of new forms of dialects, fixing the peculiarities of perception by the group (sociolect) and the individual (idiolect) of both primary and secondary reality. These dialects are geographically localized and at the same time multicultural. The article substantiates the conclusion that the instrumentalization of the performance society occurs due to the active use of grotesque symbolism, which, due to its archetypal nature, ensures the formation of a new social mythology that enables the discovery of Eastern Europe by the rest of the world. Thus, the anti-world of the new universe turns into an integral part of the modern information space.

About the Authors

V. M. Ovchinnikov
Smolensk Regional Education Development Institute
Russian Federation

Vladimir M. Ovchinnikov – PhD in History, Associate Professor in the Department of Methods of Teaching Subjects of Basic and Secondary Education

20A, ul. Oktyabrskoy Revolutsii, Smolensk, 214000



P. J. Paulus

Russian Federation

Paul J. Paulus – independent researcher



References

1. Averintsev S.S. 1992. Bakhtin, smekh, khristianskaia kul'tura [Bakhtin, Laughter, Christian Culture]. M.M. Bakhtin kak filosof [M.M. Bakhtin as a Philosopher]. Moscow: Nauka. P. 7-19. (In Russian).

2. Bakhtin M.M. 1979. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 424 p. (In Russian).

3. Bakhtin M.M. 1990. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaia kul'tura srednevekov'ia i Renessansa [Rabelais and Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura. 543 p. (In Russian).

4. Baudrillard J. 2000. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert' [L'echange symbolique et la mort]. Moscow: Dobrosvet. 387 p. (In Russian).

5. Baudrillard J. 2006. Obshchestvo potrebleniia: ego mify i struktury [La societe de consommation: ses mythes, ses structures]. Moscow: Kul'turnaia revoliutsiia; Respublika. 269 p. (In Russian).

6. Chertina Z.S. 2000. Plavil'nyi kotel? Paradigmy etnicheskogo razvitiia SShA [Melting Pot? Paradigms of US Ethnic Development]. Moscow: Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publishing. 164 p. (In Russian).

7. Debord G. 2000. Obshchestvo spektaklia [La Societe du Spectacle]. Moscow: Logos. 184 p. (In Russian).

8. Ebbe S. 2008. Asa-Tors hammare: gudar och jattar i tro tradition. Stockholm: Hjalmarson & Hogberg. 265 p

9. Fine G.A. 1983. Shared Fantasy: Role-Played Games as Social Worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 283 p.

10. Fromme, J., Unger A. 2012. Computer Games and New Media Cultures: A Handbook of Digital Games Studies. New York: Springer. 710 p.

11. Grimm J. 1882. Teutonic Mythology: In 4 Vol. Vol. 1. London: Bell. 437 p.

12. Grimm J. 1883. Teutonic Mythology: In 4 Vol. Vol. 3. London: Bell. 456 p.

13. Huizinga J. 2011. Homo ludens. Chelovek igraiushchii [Homo ludens]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha. 409 p. (In Russian).

14. Jahn-Sudmann A., Stockmann R. 2008. Computer Games as a Sociocultural Phenomenon: Games Without Frontiers, War Without Tears. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 229 p.

15. Karasev L.V. 1996. Filosofiia smekha [The Philosophy of Laughter]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities Publishing. 221 p. (In Russian).

16. Kotelevsky D.V. 2014. Poniatie “iazykovoi igry” v filosofii L. Vitgenshteina [The concept of "language game" in the philosophy of L. Wittgenstein]. Epistemy: Sbornik nauchnykh statei [Epistemes: Collection of scientific articles]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skii dom “Azhur”. P. 35-42. (In Russian).

17. Kozlov M.N. 2018. Antimir v iazycheskom predstavlenii vostochnykh slavian [Anti-World in the Pagan Representation of the Eastern Slavs]. Pricernomore. 26. P. 118–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1433517. (In Russian).

18. Litvintseva G.Y. 2011. Giperreal'nost' v epokhu postmoderna [Hyperreality in the Postmodern Epoch]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture]. 2(7). P. 43–54. (In Russian).

19. Litvintseva G.Y. 2014. Smekhovaia kul'tura Srednevekov'ia i antimir rossiiskogo postmodernizma [Medieval Laughter Culture and the AntiWorld of Russian Postmodernism]. Observatoriia kul'tury [Observatory of Culture]. 4. P. 42–49. https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2014-0-4-42-49. (In Russian).

20. Lotman Y.M. 2000. Semiosfera [On the Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo. 704 p. (In Russian).

21. Lushnikova G.I., Chemezova E.R. 2016. Poetika antimira v proze Ch. Palanika [Poetics of the Anti-World in Palahniuk’s Prose]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. No. 405. P. 30–37. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/405/4. (In Russian).

22. McLuhan M. 2005. Galaktika Gutenberga: stanovlenie cheloveka pechataiushchego [The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man]. Moscow: Akad. Proekt: Fond “Mir”. 495 p. (In Russian).

23. Ryumina M. 2008. O mirosozertsatel'nykh smyslakh karnaval'noi kul'tury [On the World-Contemplative Meanings of Carnival Culture]. Chelovek smeiushchiisia: Sbornik nauchnykh statei [Laughing Man: Collection of Scientific Articles]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyi respublikanskii tsentr russkogo fol'klora. P. 78-106. (In Russian).

24. Schmitt J.-C. 1999. Ghosts in the Middle Ages: The Living and the Dead in Medieval Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Wiley. 290 p.

25. Veblen T.B. 1984. Teoriia prazdnogo klassa [The Theory of the Leisure Class]. Moscow: Progress. 367 p. (In Russian).

26. Wittgenstein L. 1994. Filosofskie raboty. Chast' I [Philosophical Investigations. Part I]. Moscow: Gnosis. 612 p. (In Russian).

27. Yurkov S.E. 2001. Postmodernizm: priblizhenie k antimiru [Postmodernism: Approaching the Antiworld]. Seriia "Symposium”, Estetika v interparadigmal'nom prostranstve: perspektivy novogo veka. Vypusk 16. Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii 10 oktiabria 2001 g. [Series "Symposium", Aesthetics in the Interparadigm Space: Perspectives of the New Century. Issue 16. Proceedings of the scientific conference October 10, 2001]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society P. 85-88. (In Russian).

28. Zhindeeva E.A., Chetvergova S.S. 2012. Khudozhestvennoe voploshchenie khronotopa «dvoemirie» v rasskazakh Iu.V. Mamleeva [The Artistic Embodiment of the ‘Binary World’ Chronotope in the Stories of Y.V.Mamleev]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Bulletin of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 14(2-6). P. 1513–1517. (In Russian).

29. Zhukova E.A. 2009. Antimir kak sposob voploshcheniia smekhovogo nachala v rasskaze E.I. Zamiatina «O tom, kak istselen byl inok Erazm» [Anti-World as the Way of Embodying the Humorous Beginning in E.I. Zamyatin’s “The Healing of the Novice Erasmus”]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki [Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities]. 7 (75). P. 323–328. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Ovchinnikov V.M., Paulus P.J. Elements of Anti-World in the Game Universe of The Witcher. The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication. 2022;1(4):49-58. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-2-18-52-62

Views: 445


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-6330 (Online)