mgimoruscultureThe Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and CommunicationThe Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication2949-6330МГИМО МИД России10.24833/RJCSC-2024-3-4-23-44mgimorusculture-73Research ArticlePROFESSIONAL DISCOURSESDynamics of Multimodal Components in English Educational Discourse: the Case of “English Grammar in Use” by Raymond Murphyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0005-8283-1223KopshukovaE. V.

Ekaterina V. Kopshukova – Ph.D. (Philology), an Associate Professor in the English Philology Department

Samara 

kopshukova.ev@ssau.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5749-7244PaninaN. V.

Natalya V. Panina – Ph.D. (Philology), an Associate Professor in the English Philology Department

Samara

panina.nv@ssau.ruSamara National Research UniversityRussian Federation202406122025342344Copyright © Kopshukova E.V., Panina N.V., 20252025Kopshukova E.V., Panina N.V.Kopshukova E.V., Panina N.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://cultures.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/73

This article aims to identify the linguistic features of English-language educational discourse in terms of structural, descriptive, semantic, and cognitive-pragmatic analyses. The relevance of the study stems from the need to identify trends in the representation of language components in modern grammar textbooks within the communicative-pragmatic paradigm of educational discourse. The authors focus on the linguosynergetic potential of the English grammar textbook English Grammar in Use by Raymond Murphy, manifested in changes of certain discourse markers in all five editions. Employing a multimodal discourse analysis methodology, this research scrutinizes the verbal and visual disparities – encompassing graphic elements, letter capitalization, italics, font, and color – that hold pragmatic value and fulfill various roles, from engagement to conveying information. The authors also investigate the interference of advertising and educational discourses and the small-format nature of texts in this self-study textbook, whose hypertext structure and internal navigational system serve as a surrogate for teacher guidance, thereby performing a directive function. A diachronic analysis of communicative scenarios within the textbook’s exercises reveals the dynamic utilization of interjections, underscoring their importance in creating an emotive-expressive backdrop that facilitates the acquisition of grammatical phenomena, reflective of their real-world application. Thus, in an attempt to represent the features of natural communication and avoid the use of linguistic terms, the author of the textbook presents complex grammatical material in the most accessible form for a wide audience. Consequently, the study highlights the textbook’s increasing emphasis on the personality-bound component, complementing the traditionally dominant status-oriented approach in educational discourse.

English translation from the Russian text: Kopshukova E.V., Panina N.V. 2024. Dynamics of Multimodal Components in English Educational Discourse: The Case of English Grammar in Use by Raymond Murphy. Professional Discourse & Communication. 6(2). P. 10–34. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2024-6-2-10-34

educational discoursehypertextconceptinterjectionssynergetic linguisticsReferencesAleksandrova O. V. 2014. Formirovanie kontseptual’noi kartiny mira na osnove izucheniia leksiko-grammaticheskoi sistemy iazyka [Forming a сonceptual worldview on the basis of lexical and grammatical system of language study]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication]. 3. P. 19–27. (In Russian).Aleksandrova O. V. 2014. Formirovanie kontseptual’noi kartiny mira na osnove izucheniia leksiko-grammaticheskoi sistemy iazyka [Forming a сonceptual worldview on the basis of lexical and grammatical system of language study]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication]. 3. P. 19–27. (In Russian).Buzinova L. M. 2017. Akademicheskij diskurs i ego mesto v diskursologii [Academic discourse and its place in discourse studies]. In Sedyh A. P. (Ed.), Leksikografiya i kommunikaciya – 2017: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Lexicography and communication – 2017: Proceedings of the Second international scientific conference], 27–28 April, 2017. P. 123–126. Belgorod State National Research University. (In Russian).Buzinova L. M. 2017. Akademicheskij diskurs i ego mesto v diskursologii [Academic discourse and its place in discourse studies]. In Sedyh A. P. (Ed.), Leksikografiya i kommunikaciya – 2017: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Lexicography and communication – 2017: Proceedings of the Second international scientific conference], 27–28 April, 2017. P. 123–126. Belgorod State National Research University. (In Russian).Chekulai I. V., Prokhorova O. N. 2019. K probleme ontologii i terminologii statusnoorientirovannyh tipov diskursa v sovremennoj lingvisticheskoj diskursologii [On the problem of ontology and terminology of statusoriented types of discourse in modern linguistic discourology]. Diskurs professionalnoj kommunikacii [Professional Discourse and Communication]. 1(1). P. 21–35. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-21-35Chekulai I. V., Prokhorova O. N. 2019. K probleme ontologii i terminologii statusnoorientirovannyh tipov diskursa v sovremennoj lingvisticheskoj diskursologii [On the problem of ontology and terminology of statusoriented types of discourse in modern linguistic discourology]. Diskurs professionalnoj kommunikacii [Professional Discourse and Communication]. 1(1). P. 21–35. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-21-35Chubarova Y. E. 2008. Funkcionalno-strukturnye osobennosti i prosodicheskie sredstva vyrazheniya diskursivnyh elementov angloyazychnogo uchebno-nauchnogo diskursa [Functional and structural features and prosodic means of expressing discursive elements of English educational and scientific discourse]. Candidate’s thesis. Ogarev Mordovia State University. Saransk, Russia. (In Russian).Chubarova Y. E. 2008. Funkcionalno-strukturnye osobennosti i prosodicheskie sredstva vyrazheniya diskursivnyh elementov angloyazychnogo uchebno-nauchnogo diskursa [Functional and structural features and prosodic means of expressing discursive elements of English educational and scientific discourse]. Candidate’s thesis. Ogarev Mordovia State University. Saransk, Russia. (In Russian).Dmitrenko T. A. 2021. Innovative Trends in the System of Language Education in the XXIst Century. Professional Discourse & Communication. 3(4). P. 73–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/26870126-2021-3-4-73-83Dmitrenko T. A. 2021. Innovative Trends in the System of Language Education in the XXIst Century. Professional Discourse & Communication. 3(4). P. 73–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/26870126-2021-3-4-73-83Dobrenkova E. V. 2007. Socialnaya morfologiya obrazovatelnogo diskursa: teoretiko-metodologicheskij analiz [Social morphology of educational discourse: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Doctoral dissertation. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Dobrenkova E. V. 2007. Socialnaya morfologiya obrazovatelnogo diskursa: teoretiko-metodologicheskij analiz [Social morphology of educational discourse: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Doctoral dissertation. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Dyakova E. Y. 2011. Polikodovyj tekst v britanskom reklamnom diskurse sfery obrazovaniya [Polycode text in British advertising discourse in the education sector] [Candidate’s thesis, Voronezh State University]. Voronezh, Russia. (In Russian).Dyakova E. Y. 2011. Polikodovyj tekst v britanskom reklamnom diskurse sfery obrazovaniya [Polycode text in British advertising discourse in the education sector] [Candidate’s thesis, Voronezh State University]. Voronezh, Russia. (In Russian).Gabets A. A. 2021. Interdiskursivnost’ kak ingerentnoe svoystvo institutsional’nogo diskursa (na primere obrazovatel’nogo diskursa) [Interdiscourse as an inherent characteristic of institutional discourse (using the example of educational discourse)]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia, pedagogika, filologiia [Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology]. 27(4). P. 107–113. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-4-107-113 (In Russian).Gabets A. A. 2021. Interdiskursivnost’ kak ingerentnoe svoystvo institutsional’nogo diskursa (na primere obrazovatel’nogo diskursa) [Interdiscourse as an inherent characteristic of institutional discourse (using the example of educational discourse)]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia, pedagogika, filologiia [Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology]. 27(4). P. 107–113. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-4-107-113 (In Russian).Gerasimova S. A. 2011. Kommunikativnyj potencial metodicheskoj zapiski kak zhanra uchebnodidakticheskogo diskursa [Communicative potential of the methodological note as a genre of educational and didactic discourse]. Candidate’s thesis, Moscow City University. Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Gerasimova S. A. 2011. Kommunikativnyj potencial metodicheskoj zapiski kak zhanra uchebnodidakticheskogo diskursa [Communicative potential of the methodological note as a genre of educational and didactic discourse]. Candidate’s thesis, Moscow City University. Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Inozemceva N. V. 2010. Sistemnye kharakteristiki zagolovkov angloyazychnyh statej po metodicheskoj problematike [Systemic characteristics of headings of English-language articles on methodological issues]. Candidate’s thesis. Samara State Academy of Social Sciences and Humanities. Samara, Russia. (In Russian).Inozemceva N. V. 2010. Sistemnye kharakteristiki zagolovkov angloyazychnyh statej po metodicheskoj problematike [Systemic characteristics of headings of English-language articles on methodological issues]. Candidate’s thesis. Samara State Academy of Social Sciences and Humanities. Samara, Russia. (In Russian).Karasik V. I. 2004. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost, koncepty, diskurs [Linguistic Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Gnosis. (In Russian).Karasik V. I. 2004. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost, koncepty, diskurs [Linguistic Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Gnosis. (In Russian).Kharkovskaya A. A. 2015. Angloyazychnyj obrazovatelnyj diskurs: sovremennye tendencii [English-language educational discourse: modern trends]. In Raitskaya L. K. (Ed.), Professionalnaya kommunikaciya i multikompetentnost: sb. nauch. tr. [Professional communication and multicompetence: Collection of scientific papers devoted to the 15th anniversary of the English language Department No. 5, MGIMO]. P. 177–181. MGIMO. (In Russian).Kharkovskaya A. A. 2015. Angloyazychnyj obrazovatelnyj diskurs: sovremennye tendencii [English-language educational discourse: modern trends]. In Raitskaya L. K. (Ed.), Professionalnaya kommunikaciya i multikompetentnost: sb. nauch. tr. [Professional communication and multicompetence: Collection of scientific papers devoted to the 15th anniversary of the English language Department No. 5, MGIMO]. P. 177–181. MGIMO. (In Russian).Kirillova I. K. 2010. Lingvosemiotika angloyazychnogo universitetskogo diskursa [Linguosemiotics of the English-language university discourse]. Candidate’s thesis. Volgograd State University. Volgograd, Russia. (In Russian).Kirillova I. K. 2010. Lingvosemiotika angloyazychnogo universitetskogo diskursa [Linguosemiotics of the English-language university discourse]. Candidate’s thesis. Volgograd State University. Volgograd, Russia. (In Russian).Komina N. A. 2004. Organizacionnyj diskurs v uchebnoj situacii: Semanticheskij i pragmaticheskij aspekty [Organizational discourse in a learning situation: Semantic and pragmatic aspects]. Doctoral dissertation. Tver State University. Tver, Russia. (In Russian).Komina N. A. 2004. Organizacionnyj diskurs v uchebnoj situacii: Semanticheskij i pragmaticheskij aspekty [Organizational discourse in a learning situation: Semantic and pragmatic aspects]. Doctoral dissertation. Tver State University. Tver, Russia. (In Russian).Kopshukova E. V. 2013. Demoversii sertificirovannyh ekzamenacionnyh materialov po anglijskomu yazyku: kognitivno-pragmaticheskie aspekty [Practice versions of certified examination materials in the English language: Cognitive-pragmatic aspects] [Candidate’s thesis, Samara State Academy of Social Sciences and Humanities]. Samara, Russia. (In Russian).Kopshukova E. V. 2013. Demoversii sertificirovannyh ekzamenacionnyh materialov po anglijskomu yazyku: kognitivno-pragmaticheskie aspekty [Practice versions of certified examination materials in the English language: Cognitive-pragmatic aspects] [Candidate’s thesis, Samara State Academy of Social Sciences and Humanities]. Samara, Russia. (In Russian).Krotkov E. A., Kozhemyakin E. A. 2013. Diskurs tolerantnosti [Discourse of tolerance]. Diskurs-Pi [Discourse-P]. 10(3). P. 137–138. (In Russian).Krotkov E. A., Kozhemyakin E. A. 2013. Diskurs tolerantnosti [Discourse of tolerance]. Diskurs-Pi [Discourse-P]. 10(3). P. 137–138. (In Russian).Kravchuk N. V. 2015. Mezhdometiya v sovremennom angloyazychnom obrazovatelnom diskurse: na materiale uchebnogo posobiya Dellar H., Walkley A. «OUTCOMES», UK: Heinle, Cengage Learning EMEA, 2010 [Interjections in modern English educational discourse: Based on the material of student’s textbook Dellar H., Walkley A. Outcomes, UK: Heinle, Cengage learning EMEA, 2010]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University]. 4(126). P. 30-37. (In Russian). DOI:10.18287/2542-0445-2015-21-4-30-37Kravchuk N. V. 2015. Mezhdometiya v sovremennom angloyazychnom obrazovatelnom diskurse: na materiale uchebnogo posobiya Dellar H., Walkley A. «OUTCOMES», UK: Heinle, Cengage Learning EMEA, 2010 [Interjections in modern English educational discourse: Based on the material of student’s textbook Dellar H., Walkley A. Outcomes, UK: Heinle, Cengage learning EMEA, 2010]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University]. 4(126). P. 30-37. (In Russian). DOI:10.18287/2542-0445-2015-21-4-30-37Panina N. V., Amerkhanova O. O. 2018. Interjections in the speech of British royal family members. Training, Language and Culture. 2(4). P. 84–96. DOI: 10.29366/2018tlc.2.4.6Panina N. V., Amerkhanova O. O. 2018. Interjections in the speech of British royal family members. Training, Language and Culture. 2(4). P. 84–96. DOI: 10.29366/2018tlc.2.4.6Ponomarenko E. V. 2004. Funktsional’naya sistemnost’ diskursa (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) [Functional consistency of discourse (based on the English language)]. Moscow. (In Russian).Ponomarenko E. V. 2004. Funktsional’naya sistemnost’ diskursa (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) [Functional consistency of discourse (based on the English language)]. Moscow. (In Russian).Radugin A. A. 1997. Filosofiya: kurs lekcij. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Philosophy: course of lectures. 2nd ed., revised]. Tsentr. (In Russian).Radugin A. A. 1997. Filosofiya: kurs lekcij. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Philosophy: course of lectures. 2nd ed., revised]. Tsentr. (In Russian).Robotova A. S. 2008. Sovremennyj pedagogicheskij diskurs [Modern pedagogical discourse]. Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Herzen University]. 12. P. 19–25. (In Russian).Robotova A. S. 2008. Sovremennyj pedagogicheskij diskurs [Modern pedagogical discourse]. Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Herzen University]. 12. P. 19–25. (In Russian).Ryazanceva T. I. 2008. Teoriya i praktika raboty s gipertekstom (na materiale anglijskogo yazyka): ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij [Theory and practice of working with hypertext (based on the English language): textbook]. Moskva: Izdatelskij centr “Akademiya” [Moscow: Publishing center «Academy»]. (In Russian).Ryazanceva T. I. 2008. Teoriya i praktika raboty s gipertekstom (na materiale anglijskogo yazyka): ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij [Theory and practice of working with hypertext (based on the English language): textbook]. Moskva: Izdatelskij centr “Akademiya” [Moscow: Publishing center «Academy»]. (In Russian).Shevchenko V. D. 2008. Vvedenie v teoriyu interferencii diskursov [Introduction to the theory of discourse interference]. Samara State Transport University. (In Russian).Shevchenko V. D. 2008. Vvedenie v teoriyu interferencii diskursov [Introduction to the theory of discourse interference]. Samara State Transport University. (In Russian).Sukhomlinova M. A. 2018. Sovremennyj angloyazychnyj akademicheskij diskurs. Genezis i zhanrovaya specifika [Contemporary English-language academic discourse. Genesis and genre specificity]. Southern Federal University. (In Russian).Sukhomlinova M. A. 2018. Sovremennyj angloyazychnyj akademicheskij diskurs. Genezis i zhanrovaya specifika [Contemporary English-language academic discourse. Genesis and genre specificity]. Southern Federal University. (In Russian).Vojtovich I. K. 2011. Didakticheskie aspekty elektronnogo obucheniya [Didactic aspects of elearning: textbook]. Udmurt University. (In Russian).Vojtovich I. K. 2011. Didakticheskie aspekty elektronnogo obucheniya [Didactic aspects of elearning: textbook]. Udmurt University. (In Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.