mgimoruscultureThe Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and CommunicationThe Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication2949-6330МГИМО МИД России10.24833/RJCSC-2023-2-3-73-84mgimorusculture-44Research ArticlePROFESSIONAL DISCOURSESVerbalization of Criticism and Praise Intentions in German-Language Pedagogical DiscourseGlushakV. M.

Vasiliy M. Glushak – a doctorate in Philology and is a professor in the Department of German language at MGIMO University 

v.glushak@my.mgimo.ruMuellerJu. E.

Julia E. Mueller – a Ph.D. in Philology and is an associate professor in the Department of German language at MGIMO University

j.mueller@my.mgimo.ruKovacM.

Marina Kovac – Ph.D., is a research assistant in the Department of Foreign Languages, Institute for Optional Studies

marina.zarudko@uni-due.deMoscow State Institute of International Relations (University)Russian FederationUniversity Duisburg-EssenGermany202319042024237384Copyright © Glushak V.M., Mueller J.E., Kovac M., 20242024Glushak V.M., Mueller J.E., Kovac M.Glushak V.M., Mueller J.E., Kovac M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://cultures.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/44

This paper deals with the peculiarities of the German-language pedagogical discourse, in particular teachers’ oral speech. Pedagogical discourse as a type of institutional discourse is characterised by a pronounced cultural component related to the differences in educational systems, traditions and modern practices of communicative interaction between teachers and students. The aim of the study is to analyse teachers’ evaluative and facilitative strategies, which are implemented in the speech acts of criticism and praise. The examples under review are borrowed from German-language speech resources that teachers in German schools are recommended to use in class. To thematically differentiate between the objects of praise and criticism of students the article is based on contextual analysis, which helps to describe the speech acts of praise and censure, using the procedure of detecting teachers’ intentions. The analysis of the grammatical and syntactic construction of the utterances makes it possible to determine the linguistic means of implementing praise and criticism in the German-language teacher discourse and to identify the corpus of linguistic means whose main function is to increase or decrease the semantic and emotional significance of the utterance components.

Transl.: Glushak V. M., Mueller J. E., Kovac, M. 2021. Verbalization of Criticism and Praise Intentions in German-Language Pedagogical Discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 3(3). P. 52–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126- 2021-3- 3-52-64

German-language pedagogical discourseteachers’ evaluation strategiesspeech actscriticism and praise intentionsReferencesBerkner S. S., Pen’kov B. V. 2003. Leksiko-semanticheskaya specifika sub”yazyka shkoly (na materiale yazyka amerikanskoj shkoly) [Lexical and semantic Peculiarities of the Sublanguage of a School (Using the Language of an American School)]. Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO. 14. P. 40–50. (In Russian)Berkner S. S., Pen’kov B. V. 2003. Leksiko-semanticheskaya specifika sub”yazyka shkoly (na materiale yazyka amerikanskoj shkoly) [Lexical and semantic Peculiarities of the Sublanguage of a School (Using the Language of an American School)]. Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO. 14. P. 40–50. (In Russian)Becker-Mrotzek М. 1993. Kommunikation und Sprache in Institutionen. Ein Forschungsbericht zur Analyse institutioneller Kommunikation. Teil IV: Arbeiten zur schulischen Kommunikation [Communication and Language in Institutions. A Research Report on the Analysis of Institutional Communication. Part IV: Work on School Communication]. Deutsche Sprache. 3. P. 264–282. (In German)Becker-Mrotzek М. 1993. Kommunikation und Sprache in Institutionen. Ein Forschungsbericht zur Analyse institutioneller Kommunikation. Teil IV: Arbeiten zur schulischen Kommunikation [Communication and Language in Institutions. A Research Report on the Analysis of Institutional Communication. Part IV: Work on School Communication]. Deutsche Sprache. 3. P. 264–282. (In German)Butzkamm W. 2011. Unterrichtssprache Deutsch. Wörter und Wendungen für Lehrer und Schüler [German as a Language of Instruction. Words and Phrases for Teachers and Students]. Hueber Verlag. (In German)Butzkamm W. 2011. Unterrichtssprache Deutsch. Wörter und Wendungen für Lehrer und Schüler [German as a Language of Instruction. Words and Phrases for Teachers and Students]. Hueber Verlag. (In German)Fang F., Freundenberg-Findeisen R. 2019. Wie verarbeiten Lernende Dozentenfeedback und welches Feedback ist für Lernende effektiv? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Feedback-Verarbeitungsprozess und zu Feedback-Effekten [How Do Learners Process Instructor Feedback and What Feedback is Effective for Learners? An Empirical Study on Feedback Processing and Feedback Effects]. Info DaF. 46(2). P. 256–286. (In German)Fang F., Freundenberg-Findeisen R. 2019. Wie verarbeiten Lernende Dozentenfeedback und welches Feedback ist für Lernende effektiv? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Feedback-Verarbeitungsprozess und zu Feedback-Effekten [How Do Learners Process Instructor Feedback and What Feedback is Effective for Learners? An Empirical Study on Feedback Processing and Feedback Effects]. Info DaF. 46(2). P. 256–286. (In German)Karasik V. I. 2002. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [The Linguistic Circle: Identity, Concepts, Discourse]. Peremena. (In Russian)Karasik V. I. 2002. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [The Linguistic Circle: Identity, Concepts, Discourse]. Peremena. (In Russian)Kovaleva E. V., Ryzhkina O. A. 2009. Obuchenie inostrannym yazykam cherez prizmu mezhkul’turnogo professional’nogo obshcheniya [Foreign Language Teaching through the Prism of Intercultural Professional Communication]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikaciya. 7(1). P. 78–83. (In Russian)Kovaleva E. V., Ryzhkina O. A. 2009. Obuchenie inostrannym yazykam cherez prizmu mezhkul’turnogo professional’nogo obshcheniya [Foreign Language Teaching through the Prism of Intercultural Professional Communication]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikaciya. 7(1). P. 78–83. (In Russian)Lakoff R. 1973. The Logic of Politeness, or, minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 9): April 13–15. Chicago Linguistic Society. P. 292–305).Lakoff R. 1973. The Logic of Politeness, or, minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 9): April 13–15. Chicago Linguistic Society. P. 292–305).Maijala M. 2012. Kernkompetenzen der Lehrpersönlichkeit im Unterricht Deutsch als Fremdsprache zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [Core Competences of the Teaching Personality in Teaching German as a Foreign Language between Aspiration and Reality]. Info DaF. 4. P. 479–498. (In German)Maijala M. 2012. Kernkompetenzen der Lehrpersönlichkeit im Unterricht Deutsch als Fremdsprache zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [Core Competences of the Teaching Personality in Teaching German as a Foreign Language between Aspiration and Reality]. Info DaF. 4. P. 479–498. (In German)Oleshkov M. Y. 2006. Modelirovanie kommunikativnogo processa [Modelling the Communication Process]. Nizhnetagil’skaya gosudarstvennaya social’no-pedagogocheskaya academia. (In Russian)Oleshkov M. Y. 2006. Modelirovanie kommunikativnogo processa [Modelling the Communication Process]. Nizhnetagil’skaya gosudarstvennaya social’no-pedagogocheskaya academia. (In Russian)Osinovskaya L. M. 2012. Osobennosti pedagogicheskogo diskursa v russkoj i amerikanskoj lingvokul’turah [Peculiarities of Pedagogical Discourse in Russian and American Linguistic Cultures]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikaciya. 1. P. 154–163. (In Russian)Osinovskaya L. M. 2012. Osobennosti pedagogicheskogo diskursa v russkoj i amerikanskoj lingvokul’turah [Peculiarities of Pedagogical Discourse in Russian and American Linguistic Cultures]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikaciya. 1. P. 154–163. (In Russian)Pen’kov B. V. 2009. Differenciaciya institucional’nogo diskursa: obrazovatel’nyj diskurs [Differentiating Institutional Discourse: Educational Discourse]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Lingvistika. 4. P. 63–68. (In Russian)Pen’kov B. V. 2009. Differenciaciya institucional’nogo diskursa: obrazovatel’nyj diskurs [Differentiating Institutional Discourse: Educational Discourse]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Lingvistika. 4. P. 63–68. (In Russian)Pen’kov B. V. 2010. Priznaki institucional’nogo diskursa: obrazovatel’nyj diskurs [Features of Institutional Discourse: Educational Discourse]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Lingvistika. 3. P. 15–22. (In Russian)Pen’kov B. V. 2010. Priznaki institucional’nogo diskursa: obrazovatel’nyj diskurs [Features of Institutional Discourse: Educational Discourse]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Lingvistika. 3. P. 15–22. (In Russian)Skvortsova E. V. 2014. Nesimmetrichnost’ polozhitel’nyh i otricatel’nyh yazykovyh otsenok v yazyke i pri ego funkcionirovanii v rechi [The Asymmetry of Positive and Negative Linguistic Evaluations in Language and When it Functions in Speech]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1. P. 342–347. (In Russian)Skvortsova E. V. 2014. Nesimmetrichnost’ polozhitel’nyh i otricatel’nyh yazykovyh otsenok v yazyke i pri ego funkcionirovanii v rechi [The Asymmetry of Positive and Negative Linguistic Evaluations in Language and When it Functions in Speech]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1. P. 342–347. (In Russian)Spiegel C. 2006. Unterricht als Interaktion. Gesprächsanalytische Studien zum kommunikativen Spannungsfeld zwischen Lehrern, Schülern und Institution [Teaching as Interaction. Conversation-Analytical Studies on the Communicative Tension between Teachers, Pupils and Institution]. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. (In German)Spiegel C. 2006. Unterricht als Interaktion. Gesprächsanalytische Studien zum kommunikativen Spannungsfeld zwischen Lehrern, Schülern und Institution [Teaching as Interaction. Conversation-Analytical Studies on the Communicative Tension between Teachers, Pupils and Institution]. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. (In German)Westdörp A. 2010. Möglichkeiten des gezielten Einsatzes der Lehrersprache in kontextoptimierten Lernsituationen zum sprachfördernden Unterricht [Possibilities of the Targeted Use of Teacher Language in Context-Optimised Learning Situations for Language-Promoting Teaching]. Sprachheilarbeit. 1. P. 2–8. (In German)Westdörp A. 2010. Möglichkeiten des gezielten Einsatzes der Lehrersprache in kontextoptimierten Lernsituationen zum sprachfördernden Unterricht [Possibilities of the Targeted Use of Teacher Language in Context-Optimised Learning Situations for Language-Promoting Teaching]. Sprachheilarbeit. 1. P. 2–8. (In German)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.