<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimorusculture</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>The Russian Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2949-6330</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО МИД России</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/RJCSC-2023-2-1-29-35</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimorusculture-30</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PROFESSIONAL DISCOURSES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The Splendour and Misery of the Anthropological Crisis: a Myth of Contemporary Russian Philosophy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zakharov</surname><given-names>A. O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anton O. Zakharov – Doctor of History, Lead Research Fellow (Southeast Asia, Australia and Pacific), Institute of Oriental Studies; Professor at the e Department of Philosophy and the Humanities</p><p>12 Rozhdestvenka str., Moscow, Russia, 107031;</p><p>29 Sretenka str., Moscow, Russia, 127051</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">Zakharov_anton@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow State University of Psychology and Education</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Zakharov A.O., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Zakharov A.O.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zakharov A.O.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cultures.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/30">https://cultures.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/30</self-uri><abstract><p>The concept of the anthropological crisis is very popular in contemporary Russian humanities: the Russian Scientific Electronic Library (Elibrary.ru) includes more than 10,000 publications with the keyword “anthropological crisis”. On the contrary, Google gives links to Russian publications only when searching “anthropological crisis”. This keyword has no reference in the famous online book catalogue Worldcat. org. Nowadays, English-speaking scientific communities still explore the crisis in anthropology as a discipline. The difference between the anthropological crisis and the crisis in anthropology seems essential. The crisis of a scientific discipline is not a crisis of human nature. Modern Russian scholars, including the late Vyacheslav Stepin, find many features of the anthropological crisis in the successes of genetic engineering and modern medicine, as well as in the growing psychological pressures that people face. Russian-language scholars find traits of the anthropological crisis in many fields, including studies of memory, bioethics, pedagogics, literature, and economics. Others, such as Vyacheslav Stepin and Boris Pruzhinin, point to the loss of a sense of meaning in life as a sign of the anthropological crisis. The problems of self-identity are also marked by Russian authors as a mark of that crisis. Sergey Averintsev felt that human beings lack human nature. Pruzhinin supposes humans cannot predict the consequences of genetic engineering for their nature as a species. But all these trends have nothing in common with the anthropological crisis. Genetic engineering helps to improve human health and self-realization. Certainly, we cannot envision all the possible consequences, but this is true of any scientific discovery or breakthrough. Cyborgs are an inevitable step towards healthier and smarter humans. Existential problems are universal since all humans are endowed with self-consciousness. Self-identities have been in constant flux since the birth of complex societies, especially since the industrial revolution strengthened alienation. The growth and volume of information flows are not threats to humans, as there is no need to memorize all the data in the world, and there are multiple network and personal filters which block garbage. The anthropological crisis seems a myth in contemporary Russian-language humanities in general and philosophy in particular. </p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>mythology</kwd><kwd>science</kwd><kwd>anthropological crisis</kwd><kwd>contemporaneity</kwd><kwd>Russian philosophy</kwd><kwd>industrial society</kwd><kwd>technocratic civilization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beck U. 2015. Weltrisikogesellschaft: auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Edition zweite Moderne).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beck U. 2015. Weltrisikogesellschaft: auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Edition zweite Moderne).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beck U. 2016. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beck U. 2016. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boronoeva N. A. 2013. Antropologicheskiy krizis v kontekste globalizatsii [Anthropological crisis in the context of globalization]. Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 5. P. 202–207. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boronoeva N. A. 2013. Antropologicheskiy krizis v kontekste globalizatsii [Anthropological crisis in the context of globalization]. Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 5.  P. 202–207. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eriksen T. H. 2001. Øyeblikkets tyranni. Oslo: Aschehoud. In Tiraniya momenta: Vremya v epokhu informatsii. 2003. (Russ. ed.). Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eriksen T. H. 2001. Øyeblikkets tyranni. Oslo: Aschehoud. In Tiraniya momenta: Vremya v epokhu informatsii. 2003. (Russ. ed.). Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kamalieva I. R. 2018. The Anthropological Crisis in Modern Medicine. Philosophy and Culture. 5(5). P. 65–70. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2018.5.26164</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kamalieva I. R. 2018. The Anthropological Crisis in Modern Medicine. Philosophy and Culture. 5(5). P. 65–70. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2018.5.26164</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kolyadko I. N. 2022. The Anthropological Crisis of the Technogenic Civilization: Parameters and Perspectives on How to Overcome it. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 76–80. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-76-80</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolyadko I. N. 2022. The Anthropological Crisis of the Technogenic Civilization: Parameters and Perspectives on How to Overcome it. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 76–80. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-76-80</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Korol A. D. 2021. The Anthropological Crisis in the Social Realities of the 21st Century. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 64(5). P. 45–56. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-5-45-56</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korol A. D. 2021. The Anthropological Crisis in the Social Realities of the 21st Century. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 64(5). P. 45–56. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-5-45-56</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krokhina N. P. 2020. The Anthropological Crisis in the Reception of Russian Literature of the Late Twentieth Century. Noosfernye issledovaniâ. 2. P. 78–83. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46724/NOOS.2020.2.78-83</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krokhina N. P. 2020. The Anthropological Crisis in the Reception of Russian Literature of the Late Twentieth Century. Noosfernye issledovaniâ. 2. P. 78–83. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.46724/NOOS.2020.2.78-83</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lomako O. M. 2019. The Anthropological Crisis in the Risk Society: A Philosophical Analysis. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 23(1). P. 66–73. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-1-66-73</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lomako O. M. 2019. The Anthropological Crisis in the Risk Society: A Philosophical Analysis. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 23(1). P. 66–73. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-1-66-73</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pruzhinin B. I. 2022. The Anthropological Crisis as a Theme of Philosophy. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 86–92. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-86-92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pruzhinin B. I. 2022. The Anthropological Crisis as a Theme of Philosophy. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 86–92. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-86-92.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rybakov S., Stepanov I. I. 2021. Postmodernism in Pedagogy as a Reflection of the Fundamental Anthropological Crisis. Duhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie. 4. P. 3–8. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rybakov S., Stepanov I. I. 2021. Postmodernism in Pedagogy as a Reflection of the Fundamental Anthropological Crisis. Duhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie. 4. P. 3–8. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sabancheev R. Y. 2022. The Phenomenon of Memory in the Era of the Crisis of Technogenic Civilization. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 71–75. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-87442022-3-71-75</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sabancheev R. Y. 2022. The Phenomenon of Memory in the Era of the Crisis of Technogenic Civilization. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 71–75. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-87442022-3-71-75</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sokolova S. N. 2021. The Anthropological Crisis: Human Security and Society During the Pandemic. Vestnik Polesskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ obŝestvennyh i gumanitarnyh nauk. 1. P. 74–80. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolova S. N. 2021. The Anthropological Crisis: Human Security and Society During the Pandemic. Vestnik Polesskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ obŝestvennyh i gumanitarnyh nauk. 1. P. 74–80. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stepin V. S. 2011. Tsivilizatsiya i kul’tura [Civilization and Culture]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP Publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stepin V. S. 2011. Tsivilizatsiya i kul’tura [Civilization and Culture]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP Publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sugrobova Y. Y., Karpova I. D., Dorofei Y. O. 2020. The Parameters of the Anthropological Crisis and the Modern Global Generation. Man and Culture. 6. P. 22–34. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8744.2020.6.34308</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sugrobova Y. Y., Karpova I. D., Dorofei Y. O. 2020. The Parameters of the Anthropological Crisis and the Modern Global Generation. Man and Culture. 6. P. 22–34. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.25136/2409-8744.2020.6.34308</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Terekhin E. L. 2022. Search for New Types of Scientific Rationality in an Anthropological Crisis: a Relativistic Approach. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 81–86. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-81-85</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Terekhin E. L. 2022. Search for New Types of Scientific Rationality in an Anthropological Crisis: a Relativistic Approach. Voprosy Filosofii. 3. P. 81–86. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi. org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-81-85</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhelnin A. I. 2015. The Informational Dimension of the Anthropologic Crisis of Civilization (on the Informational Impact on the Person, Human Psychology and Biology). Informacionnoe obŝestvo. 6. P. 35–41. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhelnin A. I. 2015. The Informational Dimension of the Anthropologic Crisis of Civilization (on the Informational Impact on the Person, Human Psychology and Biology). Informacionnoe obŝestvo. 6. P. 35–41. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zvonok A. A. 2021. Modern Science and Education: Anthropological Crisis. Vestnik Luganskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. Ser. 1: Pegagogicheskie nauki. Ovrazovanie. 64(2). P. 5–9. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zvonok A. A. 2021. Modern Science and Education: Anthropological Crisis. Vestnik Luganskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. Ser. 1: Pegagogicheskie nauki. Ovrazovanie. 64(2). P. 5–9. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
